Near where Bat Creek runs into the Tennessee River in Loudon
County, three Mississippian Indian mounds were excavated in February of 1889. The third mound revealed the burial place of
nine skeletons. One of the skeletons had
been buried with several objects, including a copper bead, a drilled fossil,
two copper bracelets and one engraved stone that would come to be known as one
of the greatest archaeological hoaxes in our area’s history, the Bat Creek
Stone.
The stone, about the size of a dollar bill, was inscribed
with strange characters. Archaeologists of the day assumed that it was written in paleo-Cherokee.
John W. Emmert supposedly excavated the stone while working
for the Smithsonian. He sent the stone
to his superior, Cyrus Thomas, the director of the mound survey. Thomas had this theory that the Cherokee
Indians were the ones responsible for building the mounds and he used the
inscribed stone to prove his hypothesis.
He never once suggested a possible translation.
The stone sank into obscurity until 1970, when Professor Cyrus Gordon
announced that if you turned the Bat Creek Stone upside down, you could
easily tell that the language wasn't Cherokee, it was Paleo-Hebrew and
translated roughly to “For the Jews”. Ah ha!
We were just looking at the thing upside down the whole time!
Was the Lost Tribe of Israel actually in Loudon County? Did old world cultures actually run around
East Tennessee before Columbus even thought about the new world? Was this stone proof that the Book of Mormon
was correct in the claim that ancient Hebrews actually lived in North
America? Professor Gordon insisted that
the stone was authentic. It was excavated under the direction of the Smithsonian
after all. Surely everyone involved must
have been well trained scientists and surely they must have worked under the
most careful of conditions. Well,
actually, that was not the case at all.
Who were the men that discovered the stone and why on earth
would they lie about it?
Most scholars consider the prime suspect to be John W.
Emmert, the fellow who claimed the discovery for himself. Emmert was a former Private in the Confederate army. He was born in Bristol, Tennessee. What could have been his motives for forging
the stone? It might have been something
as simple as job security. Seems he was
known to have a drinking problem and had already sent in several letters to the
Smithsonian begging for full-time work. It
was his superior, Cyrus Thomas, who had
a theory that the Cherokee were responsible for the mound building in our area. How better to get in good with the big boss
man than to stumble on something that would prove his brilliance? Emmert would get gratitude and maybe the
guarantee of employment for the foreseeable future.
There are other theories out there. Some say that Luther Meade Blackman, a Union
Officer and a Republican, was the real perpetrator.
He moved down to Knoxville in 1855 and then to Bat Creek in 1857 to run
a monument company. Apparently he had a
lifelong hatred of Democrats and Rebels, both of which described Emmert to a
tee. Could he have forged the stone in
order to get Emmert fired? Possibly.
The myth continues to this day. The Bat Creek Stone continues
to pop up in the news every so often. Just type it in your search engine and
you will be led to a variety of sites.
Most Mormon websites that I found clearly state that the stone is a fraud and
urge the reader to not give much, if any, weight to the so-called evidence the
stone provides. Some other websites
claim the stone proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that The Book of Mormon is
irrefutable. The Bat Creek Stone even
had an appearance on television when Glen Beck showcased it on his Fox News
show in 2010. Beck stated “the
Smithsonian, Science, Government, Commerce colluded to erase” the history of
ancient Hebrew writings in North America.
Where is the Bat Creek Stone today? It belongs to the Smithsonian, but is on loan
at our own McClung Museum. You can go
there and see a small piece of Loudon County history. The stone is no bigger than a dollar bill,
but the ripples it has made continue still.
Wonderfully insightful post into your local history Susan. Thanks for sharing.
ReplyDeleteIf the Bat Creek Stone is a forgery,fake, and has been disproved as an authentic artifact, why are the Museums keeping them on campus?
ReplyDeleteWhy would you continue to keep an artifact which would bring into question the credibility of your research people, and the organizations lack of care toward healthy scientific methods of discovery?
And how do we account for Israel National News reporting about the Los Luna's Stone. The worlds oldest known copy of the 10 commandments written on an 80 ton boulder in the New Mexico desert?
Or the Newest DNA reports that many Cherokee are "more Jewish than the Jews in Israel"!
http://www.examiner.com/article/dna-scientists-claim-that-cherokees-are-from-the-middle-east
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Blogs/Message.aspx/2384
http://tmcdaniel.palmerseminary.edu/LosLunas10.pdf
It is a fake and they are holding onto it because though it's a fake it has the 1800s or early 1900s to it so there's historical background to its forgery faking it doesn't mean it's real dude just cuz they're holding on to sign does not make it real
Delete